Subtitle Seven Pounds
CLICK HERE === https://urllie.com/2tlKe1
English dance music duo Coldcut were commissioned to produce a remix of the song to be included on the \"Paid in Full\" single, with the result being given the subtitle \"Seven Minutes of Madness\".[2] When \"Paid in Full\" was eventually released as the album's fifth and final single, it became a hit in American clubs.[2] It experienced much more commercial success overseas, however, thanks largely to the Coldcut remix. \"Seven Minutes of Madness\" became one of the first commercially successful remixes, becoming a top fifteen hit in countries such as Germany, the Netherlands and the United Kingdom.[2][3][4][5] Coldcut were paid 700 pounds for their remix work. Despite its success, Eric B. dismissed the remix as \"girly disco music\"; Rakim, however, called it the best remix he had ever heard.[6] Along with the track, \"Move the Crowd\", \"Paid in Full\" peaked at #3 on the US Hot Dance Club Play chart.[7]
The EPA reports the actual releases and containment at the seven WM TRI-reporting facilities (five hazardous waste treatment and disposal facilities, one non-hazardous treatment and disposal facility and one underground injection facility). The table below shows containment in pounds for WM facilities subject to TRI reporting.
Steve Yao's Translation and the Languages of Modernism takes up the considerable task of forcing a substantive confrontation between modernism and translation studies, seeking not simply to discuss instances of translation within the modernist canon, but to explore ways in which this confrontation leaves both parties changed. On the one hand, Yao proposes that an analysis of specifically modernist translation practices can contribute to understanding \"translation\" as an activity marked in every way by what he calls \"historical contingency.\" On the other hand, he contends that a serious consideration of translation and translations reveals a \"specific compositional practice by which different writers sought solutions to the various problems and issues that have come to be understood as the primary thematic concerns of Modernism\" (7). No list of such thematic concerns will be complete for everyone, but the book's subtitle (Gender, Politics, Language) indicates where the author has placed his bets.
As lighthouses fade into obsolescence, literature aboutlighthouses flourishes. To a crowded field, both these books succeed inadding something valuable and different. Despite its subtitle, SeashakenHouses is more of a personal journey and meditative essay than a conventionalhistory. Tom Nancollas has visited seven rock lighthouses in Britain andIreland, from the relative tameness of Perch Rock on New Brighton beach tothe godforsaken Fastnet, Ireland's most southerly point, where he spendsa week with engineers on a maintenance visit.
Section 376: Federal Coordinator. An independent executive branch Office of the FederalCoordinator for Alaska Natural Gas Transportation Projects would be established, headed by apresidential appointee who would be confirmed by the Senate. The Secretary of Energy would holdthese authorities for up to 18 months while a coordinator was being put in place. The coordinatorwould be responsible for expeditious discharge of other agencies' responsibilities and ensuring thatthe provisions of the Alaska gas subtitle of this bill were complied with.
Section 377: Judicial Review. The U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbiawould be designated as having original and exclusive jurisdiction over disputes arising from thisproposed legislation. Claims arising under this subtitle would have to be brought not later than 60days after the action giving rise to the claim, and the court would be directed to give them expeditedconsideration.
Sections 421-427: Federal Coal Leases. This subtitle would modify federal coal leasingprocedures to encourage greater coal production on federal lands. Issues raised by these provisionsinclude their impact on regional competition and returns to the U.S. Treasury.
The Price-Anderson Act also covers contractors who operate hazardous DOE nuclearfacilities. The liability limit for DOE contractors is the same as for commercial reactors, excludingthe 5% surcharge, except when the limit for commercial reactors drops because of a decline in thenumber of covered reactors. Because the most recent adjustments have raised the commercialreactor liability limit to a record high, the liability limit for DOE contractors is currently the sameas the commercial limit, minus the surcharge, or $10.4 billion. Price-Anderson authorizes DOE toindemnify its contractors for the entire amount, so that damage payments for nuclear incidents atDOE facilities would ultimately come from the U.S. Treasury. However, the law also allows DOEto fine its contractors for safety violations, and contractor employees and directors can face criminalpenalties for \"knowingly and willfully\" violating nuclear safety rules. However, Section 234A of theAtomic Energy Act specifically exempts seven non-profit DOE contractors and their subcontractors. Under the same section, DOE automatically remits any civil penalties imposed on non-profiteducational institutions serving as DOE contractors.
For future contracts, the conference agreement would eliminate the civil penalty exemptionfor nuclear safety violations by the seven non-profit contractors listed in current law. DOE'sauthority to automatically remit penalties imposed on all non-profit educational institutions servingas contractors would also be repealed. However, the bill would limit the civil penalties against anon-profit contractor to the amount of management fees received under that contract (Sec. 611).
Section 630: Government Uranium Sales. With certain exceptions, DOE uranium saleswould be restricted to 3 million pounds per year from FY2004-FY2009, 5 million pounds per yearin FY2010-FY2011, 7 million pounds per year in FY2012, and 10 million pounds per year thereafter. Up to 21 million pounds could be transferred to the uranium enrichment company USEC Inc., aprivatized former government corporation. Similar provisions were included in both the House andSenate bills.
Section 667: Department of Homeland Security Consultation. Before issuing a licensefor a nuclear power plant, NRC would have to consult with the Department of Homeland Securityabout the vulnerability of the proposed plant location to terrorist attack. A similar provision wasincluded in the House bill. Under current law, most other NRC costs must be recovered throughlicensee fees. Appropriation of such sums as necessary to carry out this subtitle would be authorized. This section is new to the conference report.
The sections of this subtitle refer to alternative fuel and vehicle purchase requirements underthe Energy Policy and Conservation Act (EPCA) (P.L. 94-163) and the Energy Policy Act of 1992(EPAct, P.L. 102-486). Various requirements apply to federal vehicle fleets, as well as state fleetsand fleets operated by alternative fuel providers.
This subtitle is similar to provisions in both the House and Senate versions ofH.R. 6. However, the total authorized funding in the conference agreement ($325million) is greater than either the House version ($300 million) or the Senate version ($210 million).
Section 956: Catalysis Research and Development Program. The Office of Sciencewould be directed to support a program of catalysis R&D, which would conduct research on usingprecious metals in catalysis, design new catalytic compounds using molecular knowledge, and pursueother specified objectives. The National Academy of Sciences would review the program every threeyears. This provision of the conference report is essentially new, although the House and Senate billscontained less detailed provisions authorizing appropriations for certain types of catalysis research.
Section 1001: Additional Assistant Secretary Position. The DOE Organization Act (42U.S.C. 7133) would be amended to increase the number of assistant secretary positions from six toseven. It would be the sense of Congress that DOE nuclear programs, currently headed by a director,be headed by an assistant secretary. This provision was taken from the Senate bill.
Section 1268: Applicability. Except as specifically noted, this subtitle would not apply tothe U.S. government, a state or any political subdivision of the state, or foreign governmentalauthority operating outside the U.S. A similar provision was included in the House- andSenate-passed H.R. 6.
Section 1271: Savings Provisions. Persons would be able to continue to engage in legalactivities in which they have been engaged, or are authorized to engage in, on the effective date ofthis Act. This subtitle would not limit the authority of FERC under the Federal Power Act or theNatural Gas Act. A similar provision was included in the House- and Senate-passedH.R. 6.
Section 1272: Implementation. Not later than 12 months after enactment, FERC would berequired to promulgate regulations necessary to implement this subtitle and submit to Congressrecommendations for technical or conforming amendments to federal law that would be necessaryto carry out this subtitle. A similar provision was included in the House- and Senate-passedH.R. 6.
Section 1276: Authorization of Appropriations. Necessary funds to carry out this subtitlewould be authorized to be appropriated. A similar provision was included in the House- andSenate-passed H.R. 6. 59ce067264
https://www.river-glen.com/group/riverglen-group/discussion/baa97e9b-e10f-4e79-92bf-64610bf4323d